10/8/07
Hey Shari Thurow - Stop Sterotyping SEOs
Rants in Bitchland
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my feed or subscribe to me on Twitter, which is updated on a more frequent - and more meaningless - basis.
You know, I am starting to feel like most of my blog posts are seo rants and last week I decided to try and lay off the rants for a while. But then I came across a column today over at Search Engine Land by Shari Thurow that made me fucking fume. It isn’t the first thing by Shari to make me fume either, but this one I’m going to voice an opinion about.
The post was basically about how “blackhat seo’s” are complete scumbags and how Shari doesn’t want to be associated with “them”. Well, here’s a newsflash… being some of the most talented seo’s on the planet, “they”, hell, I’ll say “we” sure as hell don’t want to be associated with holier than thou, “put theirselves up on a righteous moral pedestal” seo’s either.
First, a little background on me since I’ve learned repeatedly in other posts that people don’t bother to research a person and tend to instead make assumptions… I started in seo with a pristine whitehat. I didn’t even know it was a “whitehat”. I simply started building websites and marketing them.
A few years in, the “blackhat” side I was hearing about fascinated me and I started playing in that space as well. It was during that time, I learned that one of the largest “thoughts” in seo was complete bullshit… that blackhat seo’s were seo’s who did “blackhat” because they couldn’t cut it in “whitehat”.
Let me be very clear in saying that some of the best seo’s I know on the planet are what many would call “blackhat seo” types. Secondly, I’ll say something I’ve been saying for years… any *good* blackhat seo can “whitehat” their asses off. Being “blackhat” really is about is figuring out what works for whitehat seo and figuring out how to automate or find “loopholes” to get to the end result faster.
That said, about two years ago, I stopped any new “blackhat” ventures. To me, the longevity process - remaining a successful affiliate marketer - with a long term vision and plan was the direction I wanted to head. Of course, nobody believes me on that latter part, but, C’est la Vie.
Now, I would like to continue my rant by responding to some of the quotes from what I guess is being called an “article”…
In other words, she assumed that I practiced black-hat SEO. I was mortified because I sat right in front of her and talked to her about graduate school. I had just been accepted into my graduate program of Library and Information Sciences with a specialty in Human and Computer Interfaces (HCI).
So, let me ask, what the fuck does graduate school have to do with anything. What, because you attended college, you can’t possibly be a “shady, worthless criminal”? I’ve got news for you, there are plenty of shady worthless criminals with pristine education resumes. That’s why we have white collar prisons. Of course, I’m assuming that it was simply an example of why you think you’re better than all those “worthless, shady criminals” who certainly wouldn’t have college degress [rolls eyes].
Many people assume that I do not respect my black-hat colleagues, an assumption that is completely false. I have a great deal of respect for their knowledge and expertise…and their cleverness.
You sure as hell have a funny way of showing it. If I say I respect you and then slap you in the face, which one rings more true? I’m guessing it’s the one that leaves the mark and the sting. Actions speak louder than words.
But I am against creating these piece-of-crap sites purely to generate AdSense income. Who is monitoring and allowing these piece-of-crap sites?
Not every shit made for Adsense site is owned by a “blackhat” Shari… there are many crap sites being promoted utilizing completely legit, above board and “within the Google guidelines” methods. Blackhat and whitehat are terms used for search engine optimizers… meaning they are related to how one markets a website, not to the quality of the website itself.
I remember one statement very specifically. “Google is NOT the government!” exclaimed panelist Michael Gray, to the great delight of the audience, who erupted with applause. I laughed at that reaction. It was cute.
And that comment was nothing but drivel meant to be demeaning to the conspiracy theory whore and every single person in the room who applauded him. Disagree with the man and the audience reaction all you want - lord knows I do at times - but maybe try doing it with a little less of an “I am so much better than all of you idiots” tone next time.
The reason I do not like being lumped in with black-hat SEOs is because they lack honesty and integrity.
If you and that entire post was an example of honesty and integrity, then I’m glad as hell that you think I have none of it.
Unfortunately, I have been an expert witness in legal cases involving SEO fraud. Clients were not fully informed about the SEO methodologies utilized to promote the site. One case in Europe involved the SEO firm stating (in writing) that they followed all of the terms and conditions set forth by the search engines.
Whoa there Shari. These are called crooks and criminals. Not blackhats. A blackhat is not defined as someone who lies to their clients or utilizes methodology without their knowledge and consent of a blackhat nature. Those are scumbag seo’s. And there are tons of them. There are plenty of talentless hacks charging companies shitloads of money for “pure whitehat” seo too.
Even further, there are talentless hacks being paid shitloads of money by clients in arenas where blackhat is rampant and they don’t even understand the techniques the competitors are using because they have no experience with them themselves, and not informing clients that it makes them a less effective seo for them. Some seo’s are shit seos and their fucking hat colors have nothing to do with it.
Stating that all blackhat seo’s are criminals are no different than stating all teenage men with their pants below their ass standing on streetcorners at 1 p.m. in the afternoon are drug dealers. Or any different than when you stated that “women in seo” seemed to be more geared towards sem than the technical side (as a side note, the article where Shari stated this seems to be missing from ClickZ, however, Amanda Watlington, quoted the statement in blog post she has disagreeing with it here). It’s called a sterotype. It’s insulting to blackhat seo’s that have never been involved in fraud - remember what they say about assuming - and it’s insulting to whitehats, the search marketing community as a whole and insulting to Search Engine Land as a publication.
I’m actually disappointed and embarassed that SEL published this sterotypical drivel that is the equivalent of “seo hate speech” too.
Nonetheless, until I see most SEO professionals take full responsibility for their actions and their consequences, I will still use the label of white-hat SEO
Again, this is a scumbag seo and a scumbag business person. This has nothing to do with the blackhat/whitehat seo monikers. And again, there are plenty of talentless hacks performing seo services within the Google guidelines who are providing no value to the companies hiring them - which could also be called “fraud”.
Based on the way you came off in that article, I could form the opinion that since you are using the moniker of “whitehat seo” that all whitehat seo’s are pompous, self righteous, better than you people with small minds and who form sterotypical opinions based on their limited experiences…
But I won’t, because I know there are a lot of fantastic, kick ass, whitehat seos out there who wear their whitehat - including myself - without wrongly sterotyping those who may wear a hat of a different color.
-- Subscribe to the Sugarrae feed
Rae Hoffman

Related Posts:
People really need to realize that the way someone might practice SEO has nothing to do with their integrity and that dishonest SEO’s and incompetent SEO’s are far more dangerous to the public than black hat SEO’s will ever be.
Loved it, specially the last two paragraphs. Classy.
By the way, mr. whore made an awesome ppt not to be laughed upon.
Congrats on a kick-ass refutal, Rae! And if you feel like doing a sequel, the Sphinn comments section has a selection of further gems to pick on, heh.
I remember when hackers were the big thing in the news, mostly in the mid to late 90’s. The term “hacker” was thrown around every time some dork stole money from an ATM or shut down some government site or system. God forbid someone look past what they have heard or have conceived prior too really looking into an idea or philosophy. Bah!!
I am white hat. And I openly admit that I am so because I don’t have the knowledge or cunning that black hats do. It has nothing to do with my moral stance. If I had the drive that blacks hats do, I would easily be able to provide such a service without regret. Black hats aren’t criminals, they just find other ways to do the exact same thing we do.
Well said. There quite possibly are more “whitehat” SEO’s defrauding and screwing their clients than blackhat practitioners. First, we generally work by word of mouth so screwing clients wouldn’t get us far. Second, most of us don’t have clients anyway.
Not to be harsh, but everything she says I heard in 2003 and frankly it’s getting rather old. I was also a client of hers some time ago and wasn’t impressed.
Thanks Rae for this high class and well deserved roasting. I’ve enjoyed every line of it. Well, except of the blockquotes. ;)
Got it out now? :)
I wonder how “dark” should you go in order to place this high on Shari’s rep management Serps - Shari Thurow
[...] Hey Shari Thurow Stop Sterotyping SEOs - the blackhat white banter continues [...]
I couldn’t get past the guy’s title “Black-Hat SEOs Are Worthless, Shady Criminals”. What a bunch of tripe. Nice rebuttal to this worm
Great post! I really enjoyed your post. Did you know that it was the #1 post on http://www.MarketingLens.com ?
Now was that some black-hat SEO magic? ;)
Just kidding, I think this was just a great post worth reading which is why it got picked up. :-)
Black or Whitehat. Who cares? It`s about marketing and one way is a little more aggressive than the other. That`s competition baby. Economics.
A-Fucking-Men Rae!
Hats can make a person go bald; that’s why I threw mine away a long time ago.
A person can either SEO, or they can’t…the techniques meet the requirements of the goals. Funny how I keep seeing this WH/BH shit 5-6 years after it was first introduced.
Is it conceivable that Shari doesn’t really understand the meaning of the black and white headwear metaphor? Seems like she’s blurring her terminology slightly because she believes “black hat” means “criminal” or “fraudulent”, possibly because she takes the old Western serial metaphor literally (the hero wears the white hat, the villain wears the black hat).
Though I do agree her tone (and not just in that article, but in her other work too) is ofttimes condescending, whether Shari was offensive depends only on definitions of some words and the context in which they’re undertstood.
Shari was reacting to a public opinion that portrayed all SEO as criminals. Instead of blasting back at the ignorance of that stereotype, she sidestepped the assault and redirected it squarely at Black Hat SEO. It’s a coward’s tactic: when attacked, find a scapegoat and pass the buck. “you think *I* am bad? no - THEY are the really bad ones.” Hm. well, they say SEO people are good at redirection, but I usually think of the kind that comes with a 301 status header.
Having read the article my lasting impression is that Shari was just venting and let some of her loose thoughts fly out in public without pausing to tighten up her arguments. Kind of like I’m doing now.
Is “Black-hat” the new “witch”?
shari didn’t come up with the article’s title. she says so on the SEL comments, which are unfortunately in a gay ass iframe now.
I think you need to stop holding back…..tell us, how do you really feel?
you know whats really scary. I have testified as a expert witness for SEO 2 times now… course it was all very very very basic questions.
Well done Rae ;)
Absolutely awesome Sugarrae. Beautiful.
You got a problem with stereotypes, bitch?!
;-P
Really, I’m just f-in with ya. Please don’t hurt me.
shit rae. too good.
Hi Rae,
I love your enthusiasm. With all the reading fodder that I go thru everyday, I often need to sift thru it all to only read what i consider the most relevant that pertains to what I do.
I read every word of your post, and thoroughly enjoyed it. Thanks for addressing this all too important issue.
This is definitely one post that stands out from the rest. Thanks for being a thought leader in SEO, and dissecting Shari Thurow’s article.
The battle rolls on…
Those specific whitehats who feel compelled to state that someone not following Google’s guidelines is immoral and unethical and akin to someone who commits fraud versus those people intelligent enough to realize that Google does not set the laws or morals of this or any other country.
Since I don’t have time to read through everything that comes thru my feeds, I’m glad you’re here to show me what’s a waste of time.
I haven’t been around as long as other others who commented, but even I’m tired of the holier-than-thou crowd who have nothing better to do with their time than throw insults.
you
are
on
fire!
A lot of whitehats are whitehats because they’re not bright enough or forward thinking enough to do blackhat work.
That’s my excuse, but at least I admit it. Others apparently are in denial.
This is one of the best posts I’ve seen for awhile, maybe we are starting to see an “elite” class of SEO’rs seperating themselves from the “rest of us”.
Definately gotta make a shirt around this - thanks for the inspiration!
[...] * Please bow down and thank the Flying Spaghetti Monster that someone finally called out Shari Thurow and her regurgitated “I’m a white hat usability expert who doesn’t really know shit about real SEO but wrote a…” [...]
@algoholic - just caught your comment… too funny… and yes, I have it all out now :)
Shall we all sue her when she does this shit again? ;-)
I’m a bit too late to read your post Rae - but it’s a great reply anyway. BTW I always quote you on “any *good* blackhat seo can “whitehat” their asses off”
Congratulations. You have another subscriber.
That.
Was.
Beautiful.
Very few people realize that both blackhat and whitehats have endless complexitites; there is no easy way out.
[...] handle on all white hat techniques and in this regard Rae Hoffman a.k.a. Sugarrae agrees as she unequivocally stated that the best black hat can out-white hat a white hat. What this means is that black hats are free [...]
AMEN! I had the misfortune of hearing Shari Thurow speak. Can I get a refund? She even makes up her own terms for different SEO practices…. I heard the whole “I’m getting my PHD..” garbage too.





